Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image
What Medicare pays for 75716, what providers bill, and how the price varies across 52 states, drawn from CMS 2023 claims data.
75716 · the short answer
For review by radiologist of both arms or legs arteries image, Medicare pays about $92.95 while providers bill $515.56 on average, a 5.5× markup, a below-median markup. State-level Medicare rates range 94% from lowest to highest.
- Medicare pays
- $92.95
- Providers bill
- $515.56
- Markup
- 5.5×
- Markup percentile
- 47th
Medicare amounts are CMS-published; markup = average submitted charge ÷ average Medicare payment.
Price Range Across States
What You Might Pay
Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.
How we estimate these prices
These estimates are based on the RAND Hospital Price Transparency Study (4th Edition, 2024), which found that commercial insurance prices average 224% of Medicare rates nationally. We apply category-specific ratios: Imaging procedures average 2.24x Medicare rates. Cash/self-pay estimates blend typical cash discounts (55% of billed charges) with Medicare-based estimates (150% of allowed amounts). These are statistical estimates, not quotes. Contact your insurer or provider for actual costs.
Where this markup sits nationally
Markup (billed ÷ Medicare) across 8,901 procedures with a meaningful Medicare rate
6 more affordable than 47% of 8,901 procedures
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more procedures. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners · 2023
Prices by State
| State | Medicare Payment | Billed Charge |
|---|---|---|
| Guam | $134.57 | $175.66 |
| Alaska | $129.39 | $1,812.10 |
| Maryland | $118.35 | $404.90 |
| Hawaii | $118.04 | $418.65 |
| California | $112.59 | $460.13 |
| New Jersey | $112.37 | $623.03 |
| Florida | $107.88 | $469.58 |
| Connecticut | $102.48 | $565.17 |
| Michigan | $100.32 | $437.47 |
| New York | $99.84 | $506.05 |
| Arizona | $98.35 | $350.16 |
| Massachusetts | $97.89 | $480.40 |
| District of Columbia | $96.70 | $412.94 |
| Oregon | $93.60 | $356.91 |
| Utah | $90.67 | $289.02 |
| Georgia | $90.23 | $503.35 |
| Delaware | $89.52 | $316.12 |
| Virginia | $89.15 | $341.92 |
| Alabama | $87.92 | $367.44 |
| Colorado | $87.67 | $734.82 |
| North Carolina | $87.31 | $447.19 |
| Mississippi | $87.06 | $465.25 |
| Texas | $86.91 | $955.41 |
| Tennessee | $86.70 | $368.28 |
| Illinois | $83.57 | $699.06 |
| Washington | $83.13 | $479.96 |
| Pennsylvania | $82.79 | $280.02 |
| Louisiana | $81.62 | $1,186.34 |
| Oklahoma | $81.35 | $360.53 |
| Nevada | $81.33 | $332.47 |
| South Dakota | $79.92 | $317.21 |
| South Carolina | $79.90 | $370.37 |
| Arkansas | $78.60 | $261.69 |
| Ohio | $77.79 | $252.38 |
| Iowa | $77.27 | $319.88 |
| Missouri | $76.90 | $363.67 |
| Kansas | $75.06 | $446.50 |
| Kentucky | $73.28 | $228.49 |
| Rhode Island | $73.11 | $283.94 |
| Montana | $72.90 | $245.18 |
| New Hampshire | $72.67 | $378.51 |
| Wisconsin | $72.49 | $763.01 |
| New Mexico | $72.11 | $263.97 |
| Nebraska | $72.06 | $261.77 |
| Wyoming | $71.85 | $499.69 |
| West Virginia | $71.62 | $225.71 |
| Minnesota | $71.35 | $408.81 |
| Idaho | $71.34 | $275.13 |
| North Dakota | $70.27 | $324.82 |
| Indiana | $69.96 | $322.17 |
| Puerto Rico | $69.40 | $125.37 |
| Maine | $69.40 | $257.77 |
What the Data Says About Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image
Across 52 states with reporting providers, CPT code 75716 (Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image) shows a national average Medicare payment of $92.95 against an average billed charge of $515.56. That gap, a 5.5x markup, or 455% above the Medicare allowed amount, is narrower than most procedures in our dataset, suggesting providers price this code closer to what payers actually reimburse.
Imaging procedures like this one saw 46.4K services billed to Medicare in 2023 by 7.4K distinct providers, serving 41.9K unique beneficiaries. State-level variation is significant: Maine reports the lowest average payment at $69.40, while Guam reports the highest at $134.57. A 94% spread this wide is typically a GPCI story: practice-expense and malpractice-premium components of the fee formula diverge sharply by locality even though the procedure code never changes.
Applying RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios specific to the Imaging category (2.24x), the estimated commercial insurance price lands near $261.39, with self-pay cash discounts commonly bringing the figure closer to $229.30. Within Imaging, Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image ranks #30 of 133 tracked procedures by national average Medicare payment.
What to do with this
If you may have review by radiologist of both arms or legs arteries image done, these steps turn the numbers above into a real-world cost estimate.
- Request a Good Faith Estimate from your provider at least 3 business days before a scheduled procedure, under the No Surprises Act it is an enforceable written price.
- Compare review by radiologist of both arms or legs arteries image costs in your state, Medicare rates vary by locality. Browse states
- Check a hospital’s published cash price, which is often far below the billed charge. Price transparency
- Understand why billed charges run several times the Medicare rate before you negotiate. Read the guide
Figures here are averages and estimates, not a quote. Confirm coverage and out-of-pocket costs with your insurer and provider.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image cost?
Medicare's national average payment for Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image (CPT 75716) is $92.95, with providers billing $515.56 on average; state rates run from $69.40 to $134.57, a meaningful but not extreme spread.
Why do providers charge more than Medicare pays?
Providers set their own chargemaster rates (billed charges), which are typically much higher than what any insurer pays. Medicare pays a fixed rate based on the procedure code and geographic location. The billed charge is relevant mainly for uninsured patients, who may face prices closer to the submitted charge.
How much does Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image cost with insurance?
With commercial insurance, review by radiologist of both arms or legs arteries image costs an estimated $261.39 on average (range: $182.98-$365.95), a moderate premium over Medicare's $92.95. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $229.30.
Which state has the lowest cost for Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image?
Maine has the lowest average Medicare payment for Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image at $69.40, while Guam has the highest at $134.57 - a meaningful $65.17 spread.
How many providers perform Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image?
A moderate provider base performs Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image: 7.4K providers nationally, totaling 46.4K Medicare-billed services (41.9K beneficiaries) across 52 states in 2023.
What is the billed-to-Medicare markup for Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image?
Providers bill 5.5x what Medicare pays for Review By Radiologist Of Both Arms Or Legs Arteries Image - a below-median markup at 455% above the Medicare rate.
Related Guides
Tips to reduce out-of-pocket costs
Your right to upfront pricing
How Medicare payments work
Decode charges and codes
Why bills exceed actual costs
Geographic pricing factors
Data from CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners (2023).
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainProcedure is rendered directly from CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.