Connecticut · 93248

Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days in Connecticut

Connecticut Medicare Avg
$20.77
4% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$19.87
All states combined
Billed Charge (CT)
$136.82
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CT)
$68.09
National avg: $57.57
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CT)
$57.65
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

1.6K
Services in CT
229
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Connecticut Pricing in Context

In Connecticut, CPT code 93248 (Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days) carries an average Medicare payment of $20.77 — 4% above the national benchmark of $19.87. 229 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 1.6K total services. Individual payments in CT ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Connecticut is $136.82, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Connecticut sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Cardiac Testing procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Connecticut lands near $68.09, with self-pay cash prices typically around $57.65. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days cost in Connecticut?

The average Medicare payment for Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days in Connecticut is $20.77, which is 4% above the national average of $19.87. Providers in CT typically bill $136.82 for this procedure.

What does Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days cost with insurance in Connecticut?

With commercial insurance in Connecticut, Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days costs an estimated $68.09. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $57.65. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days in Connecticut?

229 providers in Connecticut billed Medicare for Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days in 2023, performing 1.6K total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days cheaper in Connecticut than the national average?

No — Heart Rhythm Review And Interpretation Of Continous External Ekg Over 8-15 Days costs 4% above the national average in Connecticut. The state average Medicare payment is $20.77 compared to $19.87 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial