Connecticut · 77285

Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Connecticut

Connecticut Medicare Avg
$371.59
14% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$325.19
All states combined
Billed Charge (CT)
$837.75
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CT)
$1,234.44
National avg: $917.18
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CT)
$593.45
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

19
Services in CT
3
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Connecticut Pricing in Context

In Connecticut, CPT code 77285 (Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas) carries an average Medicare payment of $371.59 — 14% above the national benchmark of $325.19. 3 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 19 total services. Individual payments in CT ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Connecticut is $837.75, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Connecticut sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Imaging procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Connecticut lands near $1,234.44, with self-pay cash prices typically around $593.45. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cost in Connecticut?

The average Medicare payment for Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Connecticut is $371.59, which is 14% above the national average of $325.19. Providers in CT typically bill $837.75 for this procedure.

What does Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cost with insurance in Connecticut?

With commercial insurance in Connecticut, Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas costs an estimated $1,234.44. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $593.45. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Connecticut?

3 providers in Connecticut billed Medicare for Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in 2023, performing 19 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cheaper in Connecticut than the national average?

No — Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas costs 14% above the national average in Connecticut. The state average Medicare payment is $371.59 compared to $325.19 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial