Utah · 52235

Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm in Utah

Utah Medicare Avg
$342.52
6% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$323.07
All states combined
Billed Charge (UT)
$1,952.40
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (UT)
$951.85
National avg: $916.25
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (UT)
$861.40
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

228
Services in UT
52
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Utah Pricing in Context

In Utah, CPT code 52235 (Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm) carries an average Medicare payment of $342.52 — 6% above the national benchmark of $323.07. 52 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 228 total services. Individual payments in UT ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Utah is $1,952.40, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Utah sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Urinary Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Utah lands near $951.85, with self-pay cash prices typically around $861.40. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm cost in Utah?

The average Medicare payment for Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm in Utah is $342.52, which is 6% above the national average of $323.07. Providers in UT typically bill $1,952.40 for this procedure.

What does Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm cost with insurance in Utah?

With commercial insurance in Utah, Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm costs an estimated $951.85. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $861.40. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm in Utah?

52 providers in Utah billed Medicare for Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm in 2023, performing 228 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm cheaper in Utah than the national average?

No — Destruction And/or Removal Of Growth Of Bladder And Urethra Using An Endoscope, 2.0-5.0 Cm costs 6% above the national average in Utah. The state average Medicare payment is $342.52 compared to $323.07 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial