Connecticut · 49418

Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist in Connecticut

Connecticut Medicare Avg
$158.93
31% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$229.93
All states combined
Billed Charge (CT)
$4,661.09
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CT)
$507.27
National avg: $651.27
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CT)
$1,431.00
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

63
Services in CT
36
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Connecticut Pricing in Context

In Connecticut, CPT code 49418 (Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist) carries an average Medicare payment of $158.93 — 31% below the national benchmark of $229.93. 36 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 63 total services. Individual payments in CT ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Connecticut is $4,661.09, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Connecticut sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Connecticut lands near $507.27, with self-pay cash prices typically around $1,431.00. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist cost in Connecticut?

The average Medicare payment for Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist in Connecticut is $158.93, which is 31% below the national average of $229.93. Providers in CT typically bill $4,661.09 for this procedure.

What does Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist cost with insurance in Connecticut?

With commercial insurance in Connecticut, Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist costs an estimated $507.27. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $1,431.00. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist in Connecticut?

36 providers in Connecticut billed Medicare for Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist in 2023, performing 63 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist cheaper in Connecticut than the national average?

Yes — Insertion Of Abdominal Tube Using Imaging Guidance With Review By Radiologist costs 31% below the national average in Connecticut. The state average Medicare payment is $158.93 compared to $229.93 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial