Texas · 73565

X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing in Texas

Texas Medicare Avg
$23.74
0% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$23.78
All states combined
Billed Charge (TX)
$103.45
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (TX)
$76.28
National avg: $73.21
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (TX)
$53.32
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

8.4K
Services in TX
978
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Texas

Provider Medicare Services
Evans, William MD $26.43 276
Matey, Douglas D.O. $28.42 254
Ribeiro, John MD $29.40 196
Vanden Berge, Kevin MD $28.25 186
Hayden, Taylar PA-C $23.87 163
Followwill, Jerry M.D. $25.41 139
Fuller, Brian M.D. $28.45 114
Komarraju, Aparna MD $6.21 93
Houston Premier Radiology Center... $29.76 83
Maruska, Matthew DO $28.85 82
Davey-Ranasinghe, Nicole M.D. $23.69 77
Monmouth, Michael M.D. $32.50 74
Overturf, Steven M.D. $27.39 58
Fontenot, William MD $26.37 57
Goodman, Leslie MD $27.92 48

Texas Pricing in Context

In Texas, CPT code 73565 (X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing) carries an average Medicare payment of $23.74 — 0% below the national benchmark of $23.78. 978 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 8.4K total services. Individual payments in TX ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Texas is $103.45, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Texas sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for X-Ray procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Texas lands near $76.28, with self-pay cash prices typically around $53.32. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing cost in Texas?

The average Medicare payment for X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing in Texas is $23.74, which is 0% below the national average of $23.78. Providers in TX typically bill $103.45 for this procedure.

What does X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing cost with insurance in Texas?

With commercial insurance in Texas, X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing costs an estimated $76.28. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $53.32. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing in Texas?

978 providers in Texas billed Medicare for X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing in 2023, performing 8.4K total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing cheaper in Texas than the national average?

Yes — X-Ray Of Both Knees While Standing costs 0% below the national average in Texas. The state average Medicare payment is $23.74 compared to $23.78 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial