Texas (TX)
Healthcare procedure costs in Texas.
Most Expensive Procedures
| Procedure | Medicare Payment |
|---|---|
| Sipuleucel-T, Minimum Of 50 Million Autologous... | $41,432.76 |
| Generator, Neurostimulator (implantable),... | $13,710.36 |
| Radioelements For Brachytherapy, Any Type, Each | $10,554.14 |
| Generator, Neurostimulator (implantable),... | $9,123.08 |
| Implantable Neurostimulator, Pulse Generator, Any... | $7,405.71 |
| Removal Of Plaque And Insertion Of Stents In... | $6,748.96 |
| Insertion Of Spinal Neurostimulator Generator Or... | $6,706.84 |
| Removal Of Plaque And Insertion Of Stents In... | $6,467.23 |
| Revascularization, Endovascular, Open Or... | $6,351.09 |
| Cystourethroscopy, With Insertion Of... | $5,456.34 |
Least Expensive Procedures
Top Procedures by Volume
Texas Healthcare Cost Landscape
Texas (TX) hosts 465 CMS-certified hospitals and 11,933 individual Medicare providers who submitted claims in 2023. The statewide average Medicare payment across all procedure codes is $303.51, against an average billed charge of $1,833.29. That gap between allowed and billed amounts is structural to US healthcare pricing: chargemaster rates reflect full list price, while Medicare reimburses only the statutory allowed amount determined by the Physician Fee Schedule and adjusted locally through Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCIs).
Within Texas, procedure costs span a wide range. The highest-paying procedure shown above — Sipuleucel-T, Minimum Of 50 Million Autologous Cd54+ Cells... — averages $41,432.76 in Medicare reimbursement, while the lowest — Injection, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, 1 Mg — averages $0.01. High-cost procedures typically involve surgical intervention, implanted devices, or specialized imaging; low-cost items are usually office-based evaluation, simple diagnostic services, or established-patient visits. CMS assigns each code a national work, practice expense, and malpractice value, which is then adjusted for Texas's locality factors to produce the final payment amount.
For insured residents of Texas, commercial plans generally pay between the Medicare allowed amount and the full billed charge — the exact negotiated rate depends on the insurer-provider contract and is now partially visible through hospital Machine-Readable Files published under the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. Uninsured patients face the highest exposure and should request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act before scheduled care. This page aggregates publicly reported CMS data for Texas; it is informational reference, not medical or financial advice. Confirm specific pricing with providers and insurers before any procedure.
The 465 hospitals reporting from Texas include a mix of academic medical centers, community hospitals, critical access facilities, and specialty institutions. Each is required under the federal Hospital Price Transparency Rule to publish a machine-readable file of standard charges, including gross charges, payer-specific negotiated rates, de-identified minimum and maximum negotiated rates, and discounted cash prices. Compliance varies — the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has issued civil monetary penalties to hospitals that fail to post the required data in a complete and accessible format. For consumers comparing local options, requesting the Good Faith Estimate before a scheduled procedure remains the most reliable way to obtain an enforceable price commitment under the No Surprises Act.
Provider density in Texas (11,933 individual Medicare-billing providers) is one factor in healthcare access, but not the only one. The mix of specialties matters as much as the count. A state with a high count of primary-care providers but few specialists may show short wait times for routine care while requiring patients to travel out of state for sub-specialty interventions. Conversely, a state with a heavy specialist concentration in one metropolitan area may report a high overall provider count while rural counties remain underserved. The CMS provider data does not directly measure specialty distribution by sub-state geography, but the per-hospital and per-procedure breakdowns linked below give an indirect view by showing which procedures are billed where.
Medicare procedure data is updated annually by CMS with approximately a two-year publication lag — the Texas averages shown here reflect the most recent published service year. Year-over-year changes in state averages can come from three sources: real shifts in the underlying procedure mix (e.g., more outpatient surgery, fewer inpatient stays), updates to the Physician Fee Schedule conversion factor (the dollar multiplier Medicare uses to convert relative-value units into payment amounts), or revisions to Texas's Geographic Practice Cost Index components. For state-by-state methodology details — how locality is determined, how multi-state provider claims are handled, and which volume floors apply to public dataset rows — see our methodology page or the official CMS Medicare Provider Charge Data portal.
Hospitals in Texas
How Texas Compares Nationally
When reading Texas's averages in context, three broad comparison frames matter. The first is locality-adjusted reimbursement: states with practice-expense GPCIs above 1.0 (typically coastal-California, the New York metropolitan area, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, and Alaska) systematically receive higher Medicare payments for the same procedure than states with GPCIs below 1.0 (much of the rural South, the Plains, and Appalachia). The second is procedure mix: Texas's average is the mean across all qualifying CPT and HCPCS codes billed in the state, so a different distribution of procedures — more specialty surgery versus more primary-care evaluation — moves the state mean independently of the actual per-code reimbursement. The third is the count of CMS-certified hospitals and Medicare-billing providers, which scales with state population and shapes the breadth of procedures captured in the data.
Patients evaluating costs in Texas have several reference tools beyond the CMS dataset shown here. Hospitals are required under the federal Hospital Price Transparency Rule to publish a machine-readable file of standard charges and a consumer-friendly shoppable-services display for at least 300 common procedures. Insurance plans must provide an Advanced Explanation of Benefits before scheduled care under the No Surprises Act. For uninsured or self-pay patients, requesting a Good Faith Estimate at least three business days before a scheduled procedure produces an enforceable price commitment that can be disputed if the final bill exceeds the estimate by more than $400. These tools complement — rather than replace — the Medicare claims data summarized above, which remains the most consistent cross-state benchmark for comparing reimbursement patterns rather than out-of-pocket cost.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.