Colorado · 58558

Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Colorado

Colorado Medicare Avg
$318.58
20% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$396.59
All states combined
Billed Charge (CO)
$2,432.61
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CO)
$943.26
National avg: $1,128.70
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CO)
$976.55
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

583
Services in CO
251
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Colorado

Provider Medicare Services
Harmony Surgery Center, Llc $1,115.37 20

Colorado Pricing in Context

In Colorado, CPT code 58558 (Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope) carries an average Medicare payment of $318.58 — 20% below the national benchmark of $396.59. 251 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 583 total services. Individual payments in CO ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Colorado is $2,432.61, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Colorado sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Female Reproductive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Colorado lands near $943.26, with self-pay cash prices typically around $976.55. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost in Colorado?

The average Medicare payment for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Colorado is $318.58, which is 20% below the national average of $396.59. Providers in CO typically bill $2,432.61 for this procedure.

What does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost with insurance in Colorado?

With commercial insurance in Colorado, Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs an estimated $943.26. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $976.55. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Colorado?

251 providers in Colorado billed Medicare for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in 2023, performing 583 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cheaper in Colorado than the national average?

Yes — Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs 20% below the national average in Colorado. The state average Medicare payment is $318.58 compared to $396.59 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial