Arkansas · Q9963

High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Arkansas

Arkansas Medicare Avg
$0.16
3% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$0.16
All states combined
Billed Charge (AR)
$1.10
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (AR)
$0.43
National avg: $0.45
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (AR)
$0.46
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

2.0K
Services in AR
8
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Arkansas

Provider Medicare Services
Bevill, Gary MD $0.16 511
Callaway, Matthew MD $0.17 450

Arkansas Pricing in Context

In Arkansas, CPT code Q9963 (High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml) carries an average Medicare payment of $0.16 — 3% above the national benchmark of $0.16. 8 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 2.0K total services. Individual payments in AR ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Arkansas is $1.10, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Arkansas sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Temporary Codes procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Arkansas lands near $0.43, with self-pay cash prices typically around $0.46. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cost in Arkansas?

The average Medicare payment for High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Arkansas is $0.16, which is 3% above the national average of $0.16. Providers in AR typically bill $1.10 for this procedure.

What does High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cost with insurance in Arkansas?

With commercial insurance in Arkansas, High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml costs an estimated $0.43. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $0.46. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Arkansas?

8 providers in Arkansas billed Medicare for High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in 2023, performing 2.0K total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cheaper in Arkansas than the national average?

No — High Osmolar Contrast Material, 350-399 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml costs 3% above the national average in Arkansas. The state average Medicare payment is $0.16 compared to $0.16 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial