Florida · Q9960

High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Florida

Florida Medicare Avg
$0.22
1% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$0.22
All states combined
Billed Charge (FL)
$12.15
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (FL)
$0.63
National avg: $0.61
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (FL)
$3.54
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

227
Services in FL
9
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Florida

Provider Medicare Services
Fura, Abraham D.O. $0.22 121
Lopez Diez, Manuel M.D. $0.22 26

Florida Pricing in Context

In Florida, CPT code Q9960 (High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml) carries an average Medicare payment of $0.22 — 1% below the national benchmark of $0.22. 9 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 227 total services. Individual payments in FL ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Florida is $12.15, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Florida sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Temporary Codes procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Florida lands near $0.63, with self-pay cash prices typically around $3.54. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cost in Florida?

The average Medicare payment for High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Florida is $0.22, which is 1% below the national average of $0.22. Providers in FL typically bill $12.15 for this procedure.

What does High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cost with insurance in Florida?

With commercial insurance in Florida, High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml costs an estimated $0.63. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $3.54. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Florida?

9 providers in Florida billed Medicare for High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in 2023, performing 227 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml cheaper in Florida than the national average?

Yes — High Osmolar Contrast Material, 200-249 Mg/ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml costs 1% below the national average in Florida. The state average Medicare payment is $0.22 compared to $0.22 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial