Massachusetts · 95714

Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours in Massachusetts

Massachusetts Medicare Avg
$172.87
9% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$189.22
All states combined
Billed Charge (MA)
$1,651.81
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (MA)
$562.10
National avg: $511.48
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (MA)
$616.39
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

83
Services in MA
2
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Massachusetts

Provider Medicare Services
Bogorad, Ilya M.D. $170.43 77

Massachusetts Pricing in Context

In Massachusetts, CPT code 95714 (Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours) carries an average Medicare payment of $172.87 — 9% below the national benchmark of $189.22. 2 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 83 total services. Individual payments in MA ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Massachusetts is $1,651.81, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Massachusetts sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Medicine procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Massachusetts lands near $562.10, with self-pay cash prices typically around $616.39. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours cost in Massachusetts?

The average Medicare payment for Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours in Massachusetts is $172.87, which is 9% below the national average of $189.22. Providers in MA typically bill $1,651.81 for this procedure.

What does Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours cost with insurance in Massachusetts?

With commercial insurance in Massachusetts, Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours costs an estimated $562.10. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $616.39. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours in Massachusetts?

2 providers in Massachusetts billed Medicare for Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours in 2023, performing 83 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours cheaper in Massachusetts than the national average?

Yes — Measurement Of Brain Wave Activity With Video (veeg), 12-26 Hours costs 9% below the national average in Massachusetts. The state average Medicare payment is $172.87 compared to $189.22 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial