New Mexico · 93227

Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional in New Mexico

New Mexico Medicare Avg
$12.66
5% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$13.36
All states combined
Billed Charge (NM)
$104.11
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (NM)
$37.69
National avg: $40.28
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (NM)
$41.78
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

330
Services in NM
58
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

New Mexico Pricing in Context

In New Mexico, CPT code 93227 (Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional) carries an average Medicare payment of $12.66 — 5% below the national benchmark of $13.36. 58 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 330 total services. Individual payments in NM ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in New Mexico is $104.11, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because New Mexico sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Cardiac Testing procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in New Mexico lands near $37.69, with self-pay cash prices typically around $41.78. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional cost in New Mexico?

The average Medicare payment for Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional in New Mexico is $12.66, which is 5% below the national average of $13.36. Providers in NM typically bill $104.11 for this procedure.

What does Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional cost with insurance in New Mexico?

With commercial insurance in New Mexico, Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional costs an estimated $37.69. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $41.78. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional in New Mexico?

58 providers in New Mexico billed Medicare for Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional in 2023, performing 330 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional cheaper in New Mexico than the national average?

Yes — Electrocardiogram (ecg) 2-Day Continuous With Review By Health Care Professional costs 5% below the national average in New Mexico. The state average Medicare payment is $12.66 compared to $13.36 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial