Maine · 87427

Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) in Maine

Maine Medicare Avg
$11.74
0% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$11.69
All states combined
Billed Charge (ME)
$33.33
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (ME)
$25.83
National avg: $26.18
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (ME)
$17.97
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

90
Services in ME
2
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Maine

Provider Medicare Services
Nordx $11.74 75
Affiliated Laboratory, Inc. $11.74 15

Maine Pricing in Context

In Maine, CPT code 87427 (Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin)) carries an average Medicare payment of $11.74 — 0% above the national benchmark of $11.69. 2 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 90 total services. Individual payments in ME ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Maine is $33.33, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Maine sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Immunology procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Maine lands near $25.83, with self-pay cash prices typically around $17.97. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) cost in Maine?

The average Medicare payment for Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) in Maine is $11.74, which is 0% above the national average of $11.69. Providers in ME typically bill $33.33 for this procedure.

What does Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) cost with insurance in Maine?

With commercial insurance in Maine, Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) costs an estimated $25.83. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $17.97. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) in Maine?

2 providers in Maine billed Medicare for Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) in 2023, performing 90 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) cheaper in Maine than the national average?

No — Detection Test By Immunoassay Technique For Shiga-Like Toxin (bacterial Toxin) costs 0% above the national average in Maine. The state average Medicare payment is $11.74 compared to $11.69 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial