Arkansas · 77285

Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Arkansas

Arkansas Medicare Avg
$307.25
6% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$325.19
All states combined
Billed Charge (AR)
$662.00
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (AR)
$807.49
National avg: $917.18
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (AR)
$470.44
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

13
Services in AR
2
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Arkansas Pricing in Context

In Arkansas, CPT code 77285 (Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas) carries an average Medicare payment of $307.25 — 6% below the national benchmark of $325.19. 2 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 13 total services. Individual payments in AR ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Arkansas is $662.00, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Arkansas sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Imaging procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Arkansas lands near $807.49, with self-pay cash prices typically around $470.44. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cost in Arkansas?

The average Medicare payment for Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Arkansas is $307.25, which is 6% below the national average of $325.19. Providers in AR typically bill $662.00 for this procedure.

What does Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cost with insurance in Arkansas?

With commercial insurance in Arkansas, Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas costs an estimated $807.49. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $470.44. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in Arkansas?

2 providers in Arkansas billed Medicare for Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas in 2023, performing 13 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas cheaper in Arkansas than the national average?

Yes — Obtaining Data Needed To Develop The Optimal Radiation Treatment, 2 Treatment Areas costs 6% below the national average in Arkansas. The state average Medicare payment is $307.25 compared to $325.19 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial