South Carolina · 75820

Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image in South Carolina

South Carolina Medicare Avg
$40.26
17% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$48.40
All states combined
Billed Charge (SC)
$182.78
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (SC)
$119.78
National avg: $136.53
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (SC)
$88.49
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

335
Services in SC
128
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in South Carolina

Provider Medicare Services
Mazzei, Walter MD $38.23 13

South Carolina Pricing in Context

In South Carolina, CPT code 75820 (Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image) carries an average Medicare payment of $40.26 — 17% below the national benchmark of $48.40. 128 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 335 total services. Individual payments in SC ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in South Carolina is $182.78, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because South Carolina sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Imaging procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in South Carolina lands near $119.78, with self-pay cash prices typically around $88.49. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image cost in South Carolina?

The average Medicare payment for Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image in South Carolina is $40.26, which is 17% below the national average of $48.40. Providers in SC typically bill $182.78 for this procedure.

What does Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image cost with insurance in South Carolina?

With commercial insurance in South Carolina, Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image costs an estimated $119.78. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $88.49. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image in South Carolina?

128 providers in South Carolina billed Medicare for Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image in 2023, performing 335 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image cheaper in South Carolina than the national average?

Yes — Review By Radiologist Of 1 Arm Or Leg Vein Of 1 Arm Or Leg Image costs 17% below the national average in South Carolina. The state average Medicare payment is $40.26 compared to $48.40 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial