Wisconsin · 66761

Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Wisconsin

Wisconsin Medicare Avg
$208.17
0% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$207.86
All states combined
Billed Charge (WI)
$2,504.99
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (WI)
$582.13
National avg: $606.68
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (WI)
$894.81
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

621
Services in WI
128
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Wisconsin

Provider Medicare Services
Guo, Yan $224.67 56

Wisconsin Pricing in Context

In Wisconsin, CPT code 66761 (Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session) carries an average Medicare payment of $208.17 — 0% above the national benchmark of $207.86. 128 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 621 total services. Individual payments in WI ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Wisconsin is $2,504.99, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Wisconsin sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Eye Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Wisconsin lands near $582.13, with self-pay cash prices typically around $894.81. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cost in Wisconsin?

The average Medicare payment for Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Wisconsin is $208.17, which is 0% above the national average of $207.86. Providers in WI typically bill $2,504.99 for this procedure.

What does Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cost with insurance in Wisconsin?

With commercial insurance in Wisconsin, Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session costs an estimated $582.13. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $894.81. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Wisconsin?

128 providers in Wisconsin billed Medicare for Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in 2023, performing 621 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cheaper in Wisconsin than the national average?

No — Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session costs 0% above the national average in Wisconsin. The state average Medicare payment is $208.17 compared to $207.86 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial