Michigan · 66761

Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Michigan

Michigan Medicare Avg
$195.94
6% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$207.86
All states combined
Billed Charge (MI)
$850.31
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (MI)
$542.38
National avg: $606.68
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (MI)
$425.71
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

921
Services in MI
202
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Michigan

Provider Medicare Services
Great Lakes Surgery Center Llc $125.83 30

Michigan Pricing in Context

In Michigan, CPT code 66761 (Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session) carries an average Medicare payment of $195.94 — 6% below the national benchmark of $207.86. 202 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 921 total services. Individual payments in MI ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Michigan is $850.31, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Michigan sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Eye Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Michigan lands near $542.38, with self-pay cash prices typically around $425.71. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cost in Michigan?

The average Medicare payment for Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Michigan is $195.94, which is 6% below the national average of $207.86. Providers in MI typically bill $850.31 for this procedure.

What does Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cost with insurance in Michigan?

With commercial insurance in Michigan, Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session costs an estimated $542.38. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $425.71. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in Michigan?

202 providers in Michigan billed Medicare for Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session in 2023, performing 921 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session cheaper in Michigan than the national average?

Yes — Creation Of Eye Fluid Drainage Tracts In Iris Using A Laser, Per Session costs 6% below the national average in Michigan. The state average Medicare payment is $195.94 compared to $207.86 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial