North Carolina · 58570

Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less in North Carolina

North Carolina Medicare Avg
$408.92
13% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$470.27
All states combined
Billed Charge (NC)
$2,151.85
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (NC)
$1,160.82
National avg: $1,329.11
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (NC)
$991.12
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

22
Services in NC
20
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

North Carolina Pricing in Context

In North Carolina, CPT code 58570 (Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less) carries an average Medicare payment of $408.92 — 13% below the national benchmark of $470.27. 20 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 22 total services. Individual payments in NC ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in North Carolina is $2,151.85, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because North Carolina sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Female Reproductive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in North Carolina lands near $1,160.82, with self-pay cash prices typically around $991.12. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less cost in North Carolina?

The average Medicare payment for Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less in North Carolina is $408.92, which is 13% below the national average of $470.27. Providers in NC typically bill $2,151.85 for this procedure.

What does Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less cost with insurance in North Carolina?

With commercial insurance in North Carolina, Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less costs an estimated $1,160.82. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $991.12. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less in North Carolina?

20 providers in North Carolina billed Medicare for Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less in 2023, performing 22 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less cheaper in North Carolina than the national average?

Yes — Removal Of Uterus Through Abdomen Using An Endoscope, 250.0 G Or Less costs 13% below the national average in North Carolina. The state average Medicare payment is $408.92 compared to $470.27 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial