South Carolina · 58558

Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in South Carolina

South Carolina Medicare Avg
$257.00
35% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$396.59
All states combined
Billed Charge (SC)
$2,657.97
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (SC)
$775.44
National avg: $1,128.70
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (SC)
$978.42
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

796
Services in SC
300
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

South Carolina Pricing in Context

In South Carolina, CPT code 58558 (Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope) carries an average Medicare payment of $257.00 — 35% below the national benchmark of $396.59. 300 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 796 total services. Individual payments in SC ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in South Carolina is $2,657.97, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because South Carolina sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Female Reproductive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in South Carolina lands near $775.44, with self-pay cash prices typically around $978.42. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost in South Carolina?

The average Medicare payment for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in South Carolina is $257.00, which is 35% below the national average of $396.59. Providers in SC typically bill $2,657.97 for this procedure.

What does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost with insurance in South Carolina?

With commercial insurance in South Carolina, Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs an estimated $775.44. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $978.42. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in South Carolina?

300 providers in South Carolina billed Medicare for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in 2023, performing 796 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cheaper in South Carolina than the national average?

Yes — Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs 35% below the national average in South Carolina. The state average Medicare payment is $257.00 compared to $396.59 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial