Arkansas · 58558

Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Arkansas

Arkansas Medicare Avg
$293.93
26% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$396.59
All states combined
Billed Charge (AR)
$1,758.79
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (AR)
$791.40
National avg: $1,128.70
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (AR)
$766.31
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

395
Services in AR
153
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Arkansas

Provider Medicare Services
Breniman, Kevin M.D. $900.58 13

Arkansas Pricing in Context

In Arkansas, CPT code 58558 (Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope) carries an average Medicare payment of $293.93 — 26% below the national benchmark of $396.59. 153 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 395 total services. Individual payments in AR ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Arkansas is $1,758.79, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Arkansas sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Female Reproductive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Arkansas lands near $791.40, with self-pay cash prices typically around $766.31. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost in Arkansas?

The average Medicare payment for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Arkansas is $293.93, which is 26% below the national average of $396.59. Providers in AR typically bill $1,758.79 for this procedure.

What does Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cost with insurance in Arkansas?

With commercial insurance in Arkansas, Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs an estimated $791.40. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $766.31. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in Arkansas?

153 providers in Arkansas billed Medicare for Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope in 2023, performing 395 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope cheaper in Arkansas than the national average?

Yes — Biopsy Of Lining Of Uterus And/or Removal Of Polyp Using An Endoscope costs 26% below the national average in Arkansas. The state average Medicare payment is $293.93 compared to $396.59 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial