Oregon · 49452

Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Oregon

Oregon Medicare Avg
$102.32
3% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$105.89
All states combined
Billed Charge (OR)
$1,116.81
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (OR)
$303.27
National avg: $304.80
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (OR)
$406.02
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

71
Services in OR
31
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Oregon Pricing in Context

In Oregon, CPT code 49452 (Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast) carries an average Medicare payment of $102.32 — 3% below the national benchmark of $105.89. 31 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 71 total services. Individual payments in OR ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Oregon is $1,116.81, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Oregon sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Oregon lands near $303.27, with self-pay cash prices typically around $406.02. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cost in Oregon?

The average Medicare payment for Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Oregon is $102.32, which is 3% below the national average of $105.89. Providers in OR typically bill $1,116.81 for this procedure.

What does Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cost with insurance in Oregon?

With commercial insurance in Oregon, Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast costs an estimated $303.27. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $406.02. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Oregon?

31 providers in Oregon billed Medicare for Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in 2023, performing 71 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cheaper in Oregon than the national average?

Yes — Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast costs 3% below the national average in Oregon. The state average Medicare payment is $102.32 compared to $105.89 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial