Hawaii · 49452

Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Hawaii

Hawaii Medicare Avg
$102.36
3% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$105.89
All states combined
Billed Charge (HI)
$421.65
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (HI)
$328.78
National avg: $304.80
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (HI)
$216.60
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

26
Services in HI
8
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Hawaii Pricing in Context

In Hawaii, CPT code 49452 (Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast) carries an average Medicare payment of $102.36 — 3% below the national benchmark of $105.89. 8 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 26 total services. Individual payments in HI ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Hawaii is $421.65, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Hawaii sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Hawaii lands near $328.78, with self-pay cash prices typically around $216.60. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cost in Hawaii?

The average Medicare payment for Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Hawaii is $102.36, which is 3% below the national average of $105.89. Providers in HI typically bill $421.65 for this procedure.

What does Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cost with insurance in Hawaii?

With commercial insurance in Hawaii, Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast costs an estimated $328.78. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $216.60. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in Hawaii?

8 providers in Hawaii billed Medicare for Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast in 2023, performing 26 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast cheaper in Hawaii than the national average?

Yes — Replacement Of Stomach-To-Small Bowel Tube Using Fluoroscopic Guidance With Contrast costs 3% below the national average in Hawaii. The state average Medicare payment is $102.36 compared to $105.89 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial