New Jersey · 49424

Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in New Jersey

New Jersey Medicare Avg
$28.35
1% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$28.59
All states combined
Billed Charge (NJ)
$244.67
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (NJ)
$91.62
National avg: $81.58
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (NJ)
$94.23
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

388
Services in NJ
82
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in New Jersey

Provider Medicare Services
Patel, Rahul MD $26.61 13
Biswal, Rajiv M.D. $27.46 12

New Jersey Pricing in Context

In New Jersey, CPT code 49424 (Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study) carries an average Medicare payment of $28.35 — 1% below the national benchmark of $28.59. 82 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 388 total services. Individual payments in NJ ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in New Jersey is $244.67, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because New Jersey sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in New Jersey lands near $91.62, with self-pay cash prices typically around $94.23. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cost in New Jersey?

The average Medicare payment for Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in New Jersey is $28.35, which is 1% below the national average of $28.59. Providers in NJ typically bill $244.67 for this procedure.

What does Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cost with insurance in New Jersey?

With commercial insurance in New Jersey, Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study costs an estimated $91.62. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $94.23. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in New Jersey?

82 providers in New Jersey billed Medicare for Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in 2023, performing 388 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cheaper in New Jersey than the national average?

Yes — Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study costs 1% below the national average in New Jersey. The state average Medicare payment is $28.35 compared to $28.59 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial