California · 49424

Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in California

California Medicare Avg
$31.19
9% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$28.59
All states combined
Billed Charge (CA)
$451.17
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CA)
$95.70
National avg: $81.58
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CA)
$153.98
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

1.1K
Services in CA
234
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in California

Provider Medicare Services
Rickards, Paul M.D. $26.79 22
Alzate, Gregg MD $27.48 22
Hulse, Stephen M.D. $30.23 17

California Pricing in Context

In California, CPT code 49424 (Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study) carries an average Medicare payment of $31.19 — 9% above the national benchmark of $28.59. 234 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 1.1K total services. Individual payments in CA ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in California is $451.17, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because California sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in California lands near $95.70, with self-pay cash prices typically around $153.98. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cost in California?

The average Medicare payment for Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in California is $31.19, which is 9% above the national average of $28.59. Providers in CA typically bill $451.17 for this procedure.

What does Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cost with insurance in California?

With commercial insurance in California, Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study costs an estimated $95.70. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $153.98. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in California?

234 providers in California billed Medicare for Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study in 2023, performing 1.1K total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study cheaper in California than the national average?

No — Injection Of Contrast Through Abdominal Cavity Tube For X-Ray Study costs 9% above the national average in California. The state average Medicare payment is $31.19 compared to $28.59 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial