Massachusetts · 45349

Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope in Massachusetts

Massachusetts Medicare Avg
$153.20
18% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$186.20
All states combined
Billed Charge (MA)
$906.13
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (MA)
$539.36
National avg: $540.06
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (MA)
$404.77
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

25
Services in MA
16
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Massachusetts Pricing in Context

In Massachusetts, CPT code 45349 (Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope) carries an average Medicare payment of $153.20 — 18% below the national benchmark of $186.20. 16 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 25 total services. Individual payments in MA ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Massachusetts is $906.13, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Massachusetts sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Massachusetts lands near $539.36, with self-pay cash prices typically around $404.77. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope cost in Massachusetts?

The average Medicare payment for Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope in Massachusetts is $153.20, which is 18% below the national average of $186.20. Providers in MA typically bill $906.13 for this procedure.

What does Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope cost with insurance in Massachusetts?

With commercial insurance in Massachusetts, Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope costs an estimated $539.36. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $404.77. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope in Massachusetts?

16 providers in Massachusetts billed Medicare for Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope in 2023, performing 25 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope cheaper in Massachusetts than the national average?

Yes — Removal Of Lower Portion Of Large Bowel Tissue Using A Flexible Endoscope costs 18% below the national average in Massachusetts. The state average Medicare payment is $153.20 compared to $186.20 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial