California · 45172

Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle in California

California Medicare Avg
$681.40
7% above national avg
National Medicare Avg
$635.18
All states combined
Billed Charge (CA)
$3,306.53
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (CA)
$2,063.91
National avg: $1,797.15
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (CA)
$1,554.27
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

228
Services in CA
123
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

California Pricing in Context

In California, CPT code 45172 (Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle) carries an average Medicare payment of $681.40 — 7% above the national benchmark of $635.18. 123 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 228 total services. Individual payments in CA ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in California is $3,306.53, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because California sits above the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run higher than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Digestive Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in California lands near $2,063.91, with self-pay cash prices typically around $1,554.27. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle cost in California?

The average Medicare payment for Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle in California is $681.40, which is 7% above the national average of $635.18. Providers in CA typically bill $3,306.53 for this procedure.

What does Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle cost with insurance in California?

With commercial insurance in California, Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle costs an estimated $2,063.91. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $1,554.27. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle in California?

123 providers in California billed Medicare for Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle in 2023, performing 228 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle cheaper in California than the national average?

No — Removal Of Growth Of Rectum Through Anus With Removal Of A Portion Of Muscle costs 7% above the national average in California. The state average Medicare payment is $681.40 compared to $635.18 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial