South Carolina · 27810

Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation in South Carolina

South Carolina Medicare Avg
$262.06
6% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$279.21
All states combined
Billed Charge (SC)
$2,185.15
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (SC)
$770.96
National avg: $792.56
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (SC)
$846.97
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

57
Services in SC
52
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

South Carolina Pricing in Context

In South Carolina, CPT code 27810 (Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation) carries an average Medicare payment of $262.06 — 6% below the national benchmark of $279.21. 52 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 57 total services. Individual payments in SC ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in South Carolina is $2,185.15, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because South Carolina sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Musculoskeletal Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in South Carolina lands near $770.96, with self-pay cash prices typically around $846.97. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation cost in South Carolina?

The average Medicare payment for Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation in South Carolina is $262.06, which is 6% below the national average of $279.21. Providers in SC typically bill $2,185.15 for this procedure.

What does Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation cost with insurance in South Carolina?

With commercial insurance in South Carolina, Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation costs an estimated $770.96. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $846.97. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation in South Carolina?

52 providers in South Carolina billed Medicare for Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation in 2023, performing 57 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation cheaper in South Carolina than the national average?

Yes — Closed Treatment Of 2 Broken Lower Leg Bones At Ankle With Manipulation costs 6% below the national average in South Carolina. The state average Medicare payment is $262.06 compared to $279.21 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial