Tennessee · 22842

Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments in Tennessee

Tennessee Medicare Avg
$373.37
8% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$407.31
All states combined
Billed Charge (TN)
$2,571.50
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (TN)
$1,005.34
National avg: $1,142.84
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (TN)
$1,057.86
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

2.2K
Services in TN
226
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Tennessee

Provider Medicare Services
Schroerlucke, Samuel M.D. $503.99 23
Campion, Chad M.D, $536.26 16

Tennessee Pricing in Context

In Tennessee, CPT code 22842 (Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments) carries an average Medicare payment of $373.37 — 8% below the national benchmark of $407.31. 226 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 2.2K total services. Individual payments in TN ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Tennessee is $2,571.50, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Tennessee sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Musculoskeletal Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Tennessee lands near $1,005.34, with self-pay cash prices typically around $1,057.86. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments cost in Tennessee?

The average Medicare payment for Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments in Tennessee is $373.37, which is 8% below the national average of $407.31. Providers in TN typically bill $2,571.50 for this procedure.

What does Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments cost with insurance in Tennessee?

With commercial insurance in Tennessee, Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments costs an estimated $1,005.34. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $1,057.86. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments in Tennessee?

226 providers in Tennessee billed Medicare for Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments in 2023, performing 2.2K total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments cheaper in Tennessee than the national average?

Yes — Placement Of Stabilizing Device To Back, 3-6 Spine Bone Segments costs 8% below the national average in Tennessee. The state average Medicare payment is $373.37 compared to $407.31 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial