Alabama · 13151

Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm in Alabama

Alabama Medicare Avg
$170.70
14% below national avg
National Medicare Avg
$199.14
All states combined
Billed Charge (AL)
$735.72
What providers submit
Est. Commercial (AL)
$471.82
National avg: $564.99
Est. Cash / Self-Pay (AL)
$363.17
Typical self-pay discount

Estimated using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios. Actual prices vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

372
Services in AL
75
Providers
N/A
Min Payment
N/A
Max Payment

Top Providers in Alabama

Provider Medicare Services
Digby, Michael M.D. $141.97 30
Wharton, Joshua M.D. $158.19 26

Alabama Pricing in Context

In Alabama, CPT code 13151 (Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm) carries an average Medicare payment of $170.70 — 14% below the national benchmark of $199.14. 75 providers across the state submitted claims for this procedure in 2023, performing 372 total services. Individual payments in AL ranged from N/A at the low end to N/A at the high end, reflecting differences in provider setting (office vs. facility), modifiers, and the specific geographic locality code applied within the state.

The average billed charge in Alabama is $735.72, which is the figure uninsured patients would most likely encounter before any negotiation or charity discount. Medicare, by statute, only reimburses the allowed amount — the balance between billed and paid is written off under provider participation agreements. Insured patients generally pay a negotiated rate that falls between these two figures; the exact amount depends on plan design, deductible status, and in-network participation. Because Alabama sits below the national Medicare average, commercial rates in the state may also run lower than the US median.

Using RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios for Skin/Integumentary Surgery procedures, the estimated commercial insurance price in Alabama lands near $471.82, with self-pay cash prices typically around $363.17. Before scheduling, patients can request a Good Faith Estimate under the No Surprises Act, compare cash rates from hospital Machine-Readable Files, and confirm whether the provider is in-network with their specific plan. This page presents CMS reference data for informational use; it does not constitute medical or financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm cost in Alabama?

The average Medicare payment for Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm in Alabama is $170.70, which is 14% below the national average of $199.14. Providers in AL typically bill $735.72 for this procedure.

What does Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm cost with insurance in Alabama?

With commercial insurance in Alabama, Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm costs an estimated $471.82. Without insurance, the estimated cash price is $363.17. These estimates are based on RAND 2024 commercial-to-Medicare ratios and vary by insurer, plan, and facility.

How many providers perform Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm in Alabama?

75 providers in Alabama billed Medicare for Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm in 2023, performing 372 total services. Medicare payments ranged from N/A to N/A depending on the provider.

Is Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm cheaper in Alabama than the national average?

Yes — Complicated Repair Of Wound Of Eyelids, Nose, Ears, Or Lip, 1.1-2.5 Cm costs 14% below the national average in Alabama. The state average Medicare payment is $170.70 compared to $199.14 nationally. Factors like local cost of living, provider competition, and regional Medicare fee schedules all influence state-level pricing.

Related

Data sourced from the CMS Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainProcedure Editorial